TRC at the Jefferson County Fair – August 2019


The Tarboo Ridge Coalition’s Jefferson County Fair booth received many visitors over the August 11th weekend. And did they ever have questions!! In a nutshell most people were simply dumbfounded by the County Commission’s recent new ordinance that allows private, for profit military and paramilitary training in 76% of unincorporated Jefferson County.

Why was there no State Environmental Review? Why was the Planning Commission ignored? Why is the County allowing a paramilitary training facility to be built on the shoreline of Tarboo Lake without any permits? Why is the County holding secret meetings with a Corporation intent on destroying the peace and tranquility of Jefferson County residents? In future posts we will provide more background and try to answer the most frequently asked questions we heard at the fair. When we can’t explain the County’s behavior, we’ll suggest who at the County you might contact.

Thanks to everyone who visited our booth and took the time to share their thoughts and support! This issue will take years of diligence and tenacity but together we will prevail and preserve the farms, forests and friendly atmosphere we all treasure.

June 11, 2019 9AM: TRC and County Attorneys present to Growth Management Hearings Board

Department of Community Development Letter Reprimands Fort Discovery Corporation

A May 10, 2019 letter written by the  Jefferson County Department of Community Development (DCD) director, obtained through a public records request by a TRC Board member, documents 14 years of Fort Discovery Corporation’s failure to comply with Jefferson County building codes and land use ordinances. It lays out in detail the tasks necessary for Mr. D’Amico to get authorization to build his encampment. The County continues to seek Fort Discovery’s voluntary compliance and has requested that Fort Discovery respond within 15 days.


Tarboo Ridge Coalition (TRC) hosted 37 leaders from communities throughout Jefferson County for breakfast at the Old Alcohol Plant in Port Hadlock on Saturday, March 23.  During the 4-hour session, representatives from 12 areas extending from Brinnon to Port Townsend and from the Hood Canal Bridge to Discovery Bay expressed concern about new County ordinances allowing large-scale military training at private, for-profit gun ranges and the impact this will have on the culture of Jefferson County.

In late 2018, the Board of County Commissioners opened up over 76% of unincorporated Jefferson County for such developments. TRC has appealed those ordinances to the Washington State Growth Management Hearing Board (GMHB), with a decision expected on July 17.

In its appeal to the GMHB, TRC alleged that the County failed to follow the State Environmental Policy Act, bypassed required Planning Commission review, and adopted regulations that are inconsistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan’s goals and policies. If the appeal is successful, the County will need to correct these errors or return to rules that allow only “Small Scale Tourist & Recreation” ranges at limited locations in the County.

Attendees strategized in small groups and together identified key next steps in resisting this fundamental change to Jefferson County’s land use policy.

“The support in the room and the quality of the discussion was fantastic,” said Scott Freeman, who led the forum. “Everyone there affirmed that the real issue is protecting the quality of life in Jefferson County. We support our military and honor the work that our local bases do to be good neighbors, but want to remain a rural county with a strong and growing economy based on farming, forestry, and fishing—not on privately owned, large-scale, commercial firearms training centers that disrupt our way of life. It’s shaping up to be a major issue in the 2020 local elections.”



A new year with the BOCC

It is TRC’s intention to use a multi-pronged approach to continuing our fight against large for-profit gun facilities in Jefferson County. One prong will be continuing to work to influence our county commissioners towards the will of the people in this county. A copy of this letter was sent to each commissioner last week:

The Honorable Greg Brotherton
Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners
P.O. Box 1220
Port Townsend, WA 98368

Dear Commissioner Brotherton,

Tarboo Ridge Coalition members participated in every phase of the gun range Controversy. We applauded you for the moratorium and for giving everyone time to think through the implications and consequences of Fort Discovery Corporation’s plan to build a military and law enforcement training facility, complete with seven outdoor shooting ranges, helicopter landing pads, sleeping quarters, mess hall and other commercial facilities on forestry-zoned land in our peaceful rural community.

As you know, we are disappointed that your Title 8 and 18 ordinances excluded constructive suggestions like payment and performance bonds, so that Jefferson County taxpayers won’t be left on the hook for cleanup costs; and liability insurance to protect taxpayers and incentivize gun range operators to run safe, compliant businesses. Bonding and insurance are commonly used by government and industry to limit liability and to assign costs to those who benefit.

Recently, we provided evidence that Fort Discovery was grading roads, and placing buildings on its property without permits and we petitioned you to issue a stop work order. Instead of a stop work order, Jefferson County requested Fort Discovery “voluntarily” comply with County building and environmental codes.

Letting a developer of a large gun range and military training facility “voluntarily” comply with Jefferson County codes is not the kind of code enforcement that inspires public confidence.

Given where we find ourselves, the TRC board directed our attorneys to appeal your Title 8 and 18 ordinances to the state Growth Management Hearings Board.

Attached is a courtesy copy of our appeal. We hope that after you have had a chance to read it, we can sit down and talk. Until then, thank you for your consideration.


Tarboo Ridge Coalition
Riley Parker, Board Member

It’s Time to Pull Together To Save Jefferson County

January, 2019

After the County’s new Shooting Range Safety Ordinance passed, along with revisions to the Land Use Regulations regarding shooting ranges, we heard from friends who said, Well, that’s over,” or “So glad you won!” Unfortunately, they’re wrong.

It’s not over. We haven’t won.

Despite hours of public hearings, despite months of meetings with the Moratorium Committee, despite strong support from the Planning Commission, none of TRC’s recommendations were adopted. The County’s attorney dismissed them as too expensive,” “not necessary,” or prejudicial and could lead to the County being sued.”

Worse, instead of prohibiting military and paramilitary training at private commercial facilities, the new ordinances expressly allow them. The Board of Commissioners and their Attorney have opened up 74% of forestland in unincorporated Jefferson County to new, large-scale, private, paramilitary training centers. Mr. D’Amico has advertised the fact on his Facebook page, offering to partner with individuals who want to join the Jefferson County Gun Range Rush.

What is TRC doing, in response?

TRC has submitted a complaint to the Washington State Growth Management Hearings Board about the ordinances and the process that led up to them. If the Board agrees that the ordinances are flawed, their decision would invalidate the legislation—in effect, sending both ordinances back for a re-do.

TRC has also submitted aerial photographs documenting that Mr. D’Amico has placed buildings, bulldozed a gun range, and possibly filled a wetland at his paramilitary training center site—all without permits. When confronted with the evidence, the County shrugged. Although DCD sent Mr. D’Amico a letter requesting “voluntary compliance,” Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Philip Hunsucker told TRC’s counsel that he considered the violations “a low priority.”

Fortunately, neither the Washington State Department of Ecology nor the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are as passive about enforcing the law. Both agencies sent Mr. D’Amico letters stating their intention to visit the site and evaluate what they consider apparent violations.

What is Mr. D’Amico doing, in response?

Mr. D’Amico filed two lawsuits after he realized that TRC’s drone flights had documented his illegal activity. One is a restraining order against an individual Board member, and the other against TRC as a whole. Unfortunately for Mr. D’Amico, the drone operator we hired is an experienced, licensed professional who followed FAA regulations and state laws to the letter, to ensure both safety and legality.

As Mr. D’Amico’s claims have no basis in fact, we are confident that he will lose both suits.

But make no mistake: these are “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation,” known by their acronym SLAPP. This is paper terrorism.



Will Jefferson County continue to be our home, a place where we want to raise our families? Or will it be home to large-scale, private, for-profit paramilitary training centers?

We are entering a new phase in this fight to create a future for fish, farms, forests, and families. We are moving from an initial effort focused on legislation to a longer-term effort focused on permitting and land-use regulations.

As TRC moves forward, you can be confident that we will continue to act with integrity, and that we will not be harassed or intimidated.

We will not be SLAPPed into submission. We are not terrified of paper terrorism.

How can you help?

We believe the vast majority of residents do not want Jefferson County turning into a haven for paramilitary gun camps. We must insist that our county representatives listen to their constituents. 

We will soon be staffing information tables around the County to collect signatures on a petition that asks the Board of Commissioners to enforce the law, and investigate the illegal activity occurring at Mr. D’Amico’s paramilitary training site. We hope you’ll stop by to chat and sign on!

We also need your financial support, to fund our appeal to the Growth Management Hearings Board and defend our Board members and organization against the SLAPPs, as well as be ready for any future actions that need to take place. One of D’Amico’s aims is to win by exhausting our financial resources and intimidating our board members with lawsuits. We won’t be intimidated and by contributing to our legal defense fund you can help make sure we save our county together.

Here we go, 2019!

What’s the big secret?

What’s Fair -What’s Not?

A day after agreeing to “mediation”, Fort Discovery’s attorney and the County began regular weekly meetings. These meetings extended throughout the 16 weeks during which a committee helped the County create a new ordinance expanding the size, scope and intensity of allowed gun range activities. Mr. D’Amico was a member of this committee.

46 weeks have passed since Jefferson County agreed to mediation with Fort Discovery Inc., about a moratorium on new gun ranges and owner Joe D’Amico’s complaints about Jefferson County land use rules. Tarboo Ridge Coalition, which opposes Mr. D’Amico’s plans to build seven gun ranges at Tarboo Lake, asked to observe the mediation. State law allows citizen participation, but the County and Mr. D’Amico’s attorney denied our request.

If the County Commissioners approve this new ordinance, gun ranges could be permitted to train corporate security organizations, military units, paramilitary groups and soldiers of fortune. The owner of the Fort Discovery Corporation said of the ordinance, “I think it’s fair.”

After nearly a year of meetings and communication between the County and Fort Discovery, they have not met with or appeared before a mediator. By definition no mediation has occurred. Nonetheless, whatever took place in those many meetings remains a secret because the County has redacted (blacked out) page after page of communications TRC obtained through public records requests. 

What went on in those meetings should not be hidden from the public. What influence those secret meetings had on the content of this “fair” ordinance is unknown. TRC believes the County Commissioners should not finalize the new shooting range ordinance without fully allowing the public to know what went on behind closed doors. Openness, transparency, and trust in government demand no less.

Peter Newland, Board President

Tarboo Ridge Coalition

Clarification on TRC’s position on JCSA’s training of local law enforcement

There have been a lot of rumors about what TRC thinks about the Jefferson County Sportsman’s Association.

Tarboo Ridge Coalition has never taken a position or commented about JCSA at a public hearing. We respect their long held practice of training recreational shooters.

The following statement is one of the Planning Commission’s recommendations:  “18. 20.430 Commercial and Non -Commercial Shooting Facilities 1) Organizational training for armed forces, law enforcement or paramilitary organizations is prohibited at any commercial shooting facility or any non-commercial shooting facility.”

We wish to clarify that the TRC supports the JCSA’s stated purpose, which is to “Provide free use of the facility for training purposes to local law enforcement agencies.”

This unambiguous language comes directly from the existing Operating and License Agreement between Jefferson County  and JCSA.

The current agreement with Jefferson County does not include law enforcement training for other counties nor does it include training for military groups. Training for such groups adds a burden to the JCSA in that it takes away time for members to use the facility as well as creating additional noise above and beyond what is expected for “local” uses.

It is the TRC’s position that this recommendation either:
a) assumes a “grandfathered” status for local law enforcement to continue training at the JCSA, or
b) requires a modification in language to allow the JCSA to continue providing free use of the facility for local law enforcement ONLY

One last pre-Thanksgiving assignment

Yes! Another Call to Action!

Keep our gun ranges small and recreational!

TRC supported the moratorium because we thought we would have a stronger ordinance to protect the county. This has not happened. The previous ordinance supported “small, recreational gun ranges”. The new one allows for large commercial ranges. There is overwhelming support in this county to keep gun ranges small and recreational.

The members of the Planning Commission voted to urge the Commissioners to adopt the following amendments to the current draft:

• No military or law enforcement training on new ranges. (Currently local law enforcement trains at the Jefferson County Sportsman Club.)
• Add a 500 yard set-back from any public lake
• Limit hours of shooting from 8:00 AM – 5:00 PM
• No aircraft allowed to take off or land, and no shooting from aircraft.

At the end of the evening, Michael Nilsen, Planning Commissioner Chair, reminded everyone that the Planning Commission only makes recommendations to the BoCC. It is the prerogative of the BoCC to accept the recommendations, change them or ignore them.

He urged all of us to continue to let our representatives know exactly how we feel.

CALL OR WRITE the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners. Ask them to please adopt the recommended amendments from the Planning Commission.

Kate Dean Phone: 360-385-9157 email:
Kathleen Kler Phone: 360-385-9101 email:
David Sullivan Phone: 360-385-9103 email:

Write or call today… and then enjoy your Thanksgiving. We have a beautiful county for which we can be so thankful and so worthy of our protection. Thank you for your help.

Tarboo Ridge Coalition.

What you need to know about the next steps

Planning Commission Public Hearing
Wednesday, November 7
5:30 – 7:30
Chimacum High School

Written Comments accepted October 24 – November 9 at 4:30
Submit to:
Subject line: ZON18 – 00036

Yes, this is still a roller coaster, but don’t get off now!

The newly passed gun range ordinance impacts two aspects of the County code. The regulations that passed last Friday are relevant to Title 8, which is focused on public safety. The other impact is on Title 18, which has to do with land use. Changes to Title 18 require a public hearing before the Planning Commission, which occurs this Wednesday. The Planning Commission is a group of volunteer citizens who want the best for this county. We hope that they will make recommendations to the BOCC about this section of the ordinance, to preserve our current land use code and protect our quality of life.

While Mr. Hunsucker, county attorney and author of the new ordinance, discusses a “harmonizing” of the newly passed Title 8 and the current Title 18 sections, at present they are in conflict. The Title 8 ordinance (already passed) states that if any provision in this article conflicts with Title 18 (the subject of Wednesday’s hearing), that Title 8 will prevail.

Our job together is to make sure Title 18 prevails.

The recently passed Title 8 ordinance that the Planning Commission was shown on October 17 is an expansion of gun range sizes and uses. The draft is tailor-made for operators such as Fort Discovery, Inc., Joe D’Amico’s operation, and does not comport with the purpose and intent of the Moratorium ordinance.

The TRC’s primary focus will be preserving, not removing, the existing small-scale recreation and tourist qualification for gun ranges.

We oppose any attempt in the County’s draft ordinance to re-designate commercial shooting facilities as something other than small-scale recreational tourist uses. Gun ranges in this county have always been small-scale recreational tourist uses. There is no basis for changing that designation. Recreational shooting will always be welcome in our county; sprawling training facilities will not.


We need people at the meeting this Wednesday making public comment to the Planning Commission and writing letters. We believe letters from the heart by residents of the county are most effective.

Below are some suggestions for specifics in your comments or letters:

• All new ranges should be indoors. Indoor ranges alleviate many environmental and noise problems, and are being promoted all over the United States as a way to accommodate the needs of both recreational shooters and nearby residents.

• Citizen rights to live in peace vs an individual’s right to insert a non-compatible business.

• No military training in Jefferson County. Our local law enforcement officers’ training needs are currently being met by the Jefferson County Sportsman’s Club. The Federal Government trains our military, and the military is not allowed to act as a domestic police force.

• No outdoor night shooting.

• No landing aircraft allowed.

• No overnight accommodations.

• Required environmental testing for copper.

What happens to Jefferson County if we have the most permissive gun range code in the area? Do we become the default haven for all shooters in an extended area, while sacrificing our forestry, tourism, and agricultural industries, not to mention our rural way of life?

The following are more extensive suggestions as crafted by our attorney:

1. Adoption of a 500-yard buffer zone around lakes. A buffer zone for lakes appears in the Kitsap County ordinance and should appear in ours. The County staff report recommends against adopting this provision on the grounds that it is unnecessary, since the draft ordinance will orient shooting ranges away from lakes; unreasonable, since duck hunters can shoot on lakes; and likely to result in a costly legal challenge and expose the County to liability for property owners’ attorney’s fees under RCW 64.40 and 42 U.S.C. 1983. None of these justifications is correct. The County should adopt the buffer zone.

Orientation of shooting ranges alone will not protect lakes, contrary to the staff report. Bullets do not always travel in a straight line; they ricochet. Nor does the presence of duck hunters on lakes justify the presence of shooting ranges next to lakes, since duck hunters fire only occasional blasts of short-range shotgun pellets, whereas shooters at gun ranges fire hundreds or thousands of rounds of long-range rifle bullets, year around. Given the much higher volume of more dangerous projectiles, a Kitsap County-style lake buffer for shooting ranges is necessary and proper.

2. Adoption of a 1,000-foot setback from property line. A setback of 1,000 feet from the property line to the nearest edge of any part of the shooting range. As with the setback for lakes, the main issue here is bullet safety. In addition, a 1,000-foot setback will mitigate (though hardly eliminate) noise impacts from a commercial shooting facility.

Setbacks are a common feature of land use regulations, even for relatively innocuous land uses like single-family houses. Imposing a setback on commercial shooting facilities is reasonable to protect the safety of persons on neighboring properties and has the secondary benefit of reducing the uniquely noisy impacts of these facilities. Indeed, Thurston County already has a setback for shooting ranges in its land use code.

3. Commercial shooting facilities are not essential public facilities.
An essential public facility (EPF) is one that is necessary to serve the public welfare, such as airports, schools, in-patient facilities, sanitation facilities, and transportation infrastructure such as highways and airports. These facilities are exempt from most zoning laws, because they are “difficult to site” but also provide services necessary for the public welfare. WAC 365-196-550.
A commercial shooting facility might be difficult to site, but it is not essential to the public welfare of Jefferson County. There are plenty of gun ranges within reasonable driving distance where County law enforcement officers can train and civilians can shoot for fun. There is no basis for granting any commercial shooting facility EPF status. There is no history in Jefferson County or any other county or city in Washington State of granting EPF status to commercial shooting facilities. Therefore, TRC’s draft ordinance includes a statement that commercial shooting facilities are not EPFs, and thus are not exempt from zoning laws.

4. Do not make any amendments to Table Three in the current Title 18 ordinance. Commercial shooting facilities should remain small-scale recreational tourist uses. The land use code currently provides that all gun ranges must be small-scale recreational tourist uses (JCC 18.15.040, Table 3-1). We believe this is an appropriate designation for commercial shooting facilities. Such facilities should be kept small, aimed at recreational (as opposed to professional) uses, and have a tourism (as opposed to training) focus. Our draft ordinance proposes retaining this long-standing designation. And naturally, small-scale recreational tourist shooting facilities must still comply with the new safety and land-use regulations proposed for shooting facilities.


Don’t lose heart.  We aren’t!